TAG Mobi EAM vs Oracle
A Practical Comparison for Maintenance Leaders
TAG Mobi and Oracle at a glance:
Which EAM software is best for your business?
Pick TAG Mobi if…
You’re a mid-to-large organization in sectors like facility management, manufacturing, food & beverage, or renewable energy. If you’re looking for a solution that promotes quick adoption in the field with a user-friendly interface designed specifically for technicians, rather than complex ERP screens, then TAG Mobi is a great fit. TAG Mobi is the stronger fit if you want:
Runs on a Microsoft-native backbone. TAG core writes/reads Business Central tables and processes via APIs.
Includes mobiMentor AI: multi-agent, multimodal, embedded across pages to:
• Convert Smart Requests into work orders & instructions
• Generate Work Order Summaries
• Automate repetitive admin (POs, reporting, time capture)Adds industry essentials: Permit-to-Work(PTW)/Safe Work, Lockout/Tagout (LOTO), contractor enablement, and Power BI on BC data.
Pick Oracle if…
You’re a large enterprise that requires deep, enterprise-wide EAM capabilities with proven scalability.
Provides advanced analytics and AI: predictive modeling, visual inspection with computer vision, and AI-driven scheduling.
Enterprise ecosystem: designed for complex environments and broad asset portfolios across utilities, oil & gas, manufacturing, and transportation.
Works best if your team is comfortable with:
• AppPoints licensing and usage modeling
• Phased rollouts (core PM first, then expansion into Predict/VI/Optimizer)
• Integration to ERP/finance systems via IBM and partner servicesStrong in extreme customization: code-heavy options allow tailoring for highly specific requirements, but add complexity and cost.
With The Asset Guardian (TAG), our downtime has dropped more than 38% compared with prior to implementing CMMS, which adds to the return on investment or the revenue that we're making.
–Balan Vasant Kumar, Maintenance Lead at Amin Renewables
Quick EAM comparison
TAG Mobi vs IBM Maximo
| Category | TAG Mobi | Oracle |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | ✅ | ⚠️* |
| Advanced asset management | ✅ | ✅ |
| Tailored for field users (offline, camera, scan) | ✅ | ✅* |
| Mid-size enterprise ready | ✅ | ⚠️* |
| Customizable pricing (plans & seats) | ✅ | ❌* |
| Microsoft integration (BC, Azure, Power Platform) | ✅ | ❌* |
| Advanced AI in the flow (agentic/chat) | ✅ | ✅* |
| IoT & AI | ✅ | ✅ |
| Time-to-value | ✅ | ✅* |
| Extreme customization (code-heavy) | ❌ | ❌ |
*Conditional factors (e.g., configuration, modules, licensing, or integration effort).
EAM comparison by evaluation criteria
TAG Mobi vs Oracle
Speed of deployment
TAG Mobi deploys in weeks thanks to AI-assisted onboarding and a technician-first UI that avoids ERP training, while Oracle EAM is fastest when an organization already runs Oracle Cloud but becomes heavier when integrating outside the suite.
Mobile support
TAG Mobi provides offline read/write, scanning, photos, and guided steps out of the box, whereas Oracle relies on responsive web plus Oracle Field Service or partner apps for robust offline capabilities.
AI support & automation
TAG Mobi’s mobiMentor AI works directly in the flow of work to turn Smart Requests into work orders with instructions, generate summaries, and automate admin tasks, while Oracle EAM focuses on predictive and prescriptive AI using IoT and digital-twin telemetry to trigger or optimize maintenance actions.
Integrated ERP ecosystem
TAG Mobi keeps technicians in a separate UI while writing/reading Business Central data natively via APIs, whereas Oracle EAM is deeply embedded across Oracle ERP/SCM for organizations standardizing on the Oracle suite.
Cost-to-ownership
TAG Mobi offers predictable seat-based pricing with TAG-only roles that often avoid full BC licensing, while Oracle EAM uses enterprise modular subscriptions across multiple cloud apps, typically resulting in higher total cost of ownership.
End user adoption
TAG Mobi drives fast adoption with a simplified, technician-focused interface, whereas Oracle’s modern UI works well once users are trained in the broader Oracle Cloud environment and any additional mobile apps involved.
Analytics & dashboards
TAG Mobi uses Power BI on Business Central data with Azure governance, while Oracle provides OTBI reporting with cross-suite visibility spanning maintenance, supply chain, and finance.
Industry fit
TAG Mobi includes flows tuned to facilities, manufacturing, F&B, and renewables, while Oracle EAM excels in Oracle-centric enterprises with IoT-driven asset strategies and tightly integrated supply chain planning.
Customization flexibility
TAG Mobi follows a configuration-first model using workflows, forms, and Power Platform extensions to avoid heavy customization, while Oracle EAM supports deep configuration but broader changes often require governance across multiple Oracle Cloud modules.
Scalability & future-proofing
TAG Mobi scales with the Microsoft ecosystem (Business Central, Azure, Power BI, and SaaS cadence) ensuring smooth upgrades and governance, while Oracle EAM offers large-enterprise scalability with a strong roadmap for AI, IoT, and cross-suite automation for organizations already committed to Oracle Cloud.
“The Asset Guardian (TAG) helps us ensure that the machines are running well, that we have parts on hand, and that downtime is significantly reduced.”
Kendrick Horkley
Project Lead at Ready Foods
Frequently Asked Questions | TAG Mobi vs IBM Maximo
Oracle has powerful AI — why pick TAG Mobi?
Oracle leads in predictive/prescriptive AI. TAG leads in in-flow AI that helps humans actually do the work, turning chat into work orders, writing instructions, generating summaries, and automating admin.
If we’re considering Oracle Cloud, is TAG redundant?
If you are Oracle-first, Oracle EAM fits the suite. If you’re Microsoft-first, TAG gives comparable depth with lower TCO, no extra ERP screens, and a faster rollout.
What is the cost different between TAG Mobi and Oracle?
TAG Mobi has seat-based pricing aligned to actual users. Oracle has a higher TCO across multiple Oracle Cloud modules.
Which is faster to implement?
TAG Mobi: Weeks; separate UI avoids ERP training. Oracle: Faster inside Oracle Cloud; slower if integrating to Microsoft or other ERPs.
Head-to-head summary | TAG Mobi vs Oracle
TAG Mobi provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies interactions with Microsoft Business Central through easy APIs, while Oracle EAM integrates within Oracle Cloud, offering a cohesive data model across maintenance, procurement, and more, though its structured onboarding can be complex.
TAG features mobiMentor AI, which assists technicians with chat-based workflows to convert smart requests into work orders and automate administrative tasks. In contrast, Oracle employs predictive AI and IoT technology for anomaly detection and work order optimization but may have less seamless integration with technician workflows.
TAG is ideal for Microsoft-centric environments, allowing consistent data and analytics management without complex integrations. Oracle EAM suits businesses within the Oracle ecosystem but can complicate integration with non-Oracle systems.
In licensing, TAG uses a simple per-user, per-module model, while Oracle’s enterprise-level structure may require multiple cloud applications. Both platforms offer mobile access, but TAG allows offline functionality for inspections, whereas Oracle relies on its Field Service and third-party solutions. TAG also enables condition-based work orders and data visualization through Power BI, while Oracle excels in IoT insights and analytic capabilities.
More asset management insights
Ready to prevent downtime with scalable asset management software?
Please describe your project and the product you are interested in.